Property Tax Appeal Q&A: Harry Renwick, Part II

To file a property tax appeal, or not to file, that is the question. (Apologies, again, to William Shakespeare.)  April 1st is the deadline for most property tax appeals in New Jersey. (May 1st if the municipality is undergoing a revaluation in 2010.)  With April 1st fast approaching, it seemed like a good time to check in w/ Harry Renwick of Renwick and Associates.

As you will see, Harry has spent close to 50 years as a professional real estate appraiser and has extensive experience w/ real property tax appeals in New Jersey. (Full disclosure: my office does use Renwick and Associates as an expert in property tax appeals and we are proud to do so.)  I felt that his perspective on tax appeals would be helpful to any property owner or manager who has decided to file a tax appeal or is considering it.  Harry graciously agreed to participate in a Q&A session w/ me.  Because of the amount of information, the session has been broken down into 2 posts. This is Part II.  You can read Part I of the Q&A here.  (The highlighting in the answers was done by me.)  I hope that you find the following information useful:

  • Are there any important factors that should be considered in deciding whether to file a tax appeal?  One of the most important things is to accurately define within which sub-market the subject property is competing. Once the appropriate sub-market is defined, you can then identify market data which are truly comparable to the subject property and, therefore, an appropriate basis for analysis. (Comparing apples to apples, rather than apples to oranges.) There are thousands of competitive sub-markets that may come into play and have to be considered when properly establishing a property’s value, making use of a qualified professional essential.

Another factor to consider is properly establishing a property’s “highest and best use” and the potential pitfalls in doing so. For example, it may turn out that an older, single-story office building at a high-traffic intersection has a higher/better use as a retail entity. In such a case, the filing of an appeal w/o expert assistance could result in a cross-appeal by the town and a higher property value and tax burden. (Beware of cross-appeals by the taxing municipality.)

  • What is a revaluation and how can it impact on prosecuting a tax appeal?  A revaluation involves a periodic updating of all of the taxable and tax-exempt properties within a community.  A revaluation generally serves 2 purposes. One purpose is to re-establish the current Market Value of all properties and their equitable share of the overall budget levies.  Because property values become distorted over time by changing market conditions and other factors, this step is essential in order to insure equity within the system. (Make sure that each property carries its fair share of the tax burden.)

The second purpose is to stabilize the tax rate.  Revaluation almost always results in a higher overall community value which when divided into the current levies will have a proportionate downward influence on the tax rate.  To the surprise of many, stabilization of the tax rate typically results in greater amounts of revenue being raised for each penny of the tax rate.  For example: Assume that a town’s total assessed value immediately before a revaluation is $500M.  Each penny of a town’s tax rate is equivalent to one percent of the town’s total assessed value so, in this example, a penny from the town tax rate = $50,000.00 and each penny-increase would add another $50,000.00 in revenue to the town budget.  However, if a revaluation resulted in a new total assessed value of $1B for the town’s taxable properties, then each penny of the town tax rate would result in $100,000.00 worth of revenue.  In other words, depending on market conditions, a revaluation may enable a town to maintain or reduce the tax rate, which resonates w/ the public, while still increasing tax revenue.


Only in a revaluation year is the appeal deadline extended to May 1st as opposed to April 1st during a non-revaluation year.  In a revaluation year the new valuation appearing on the tax bill (green card) is assumed to be an accurate representation of the current resale value of the property as of Oct.1st of the pre-tax year; that is not the case in a non-revaluation year.


Owners of commercial real estate should be wary of revaluations b/c towns usually tend to shift the tax burden to Class 4 properties, i.e., away from residential properties where the voters live!

  • What is an equalization rate and why is it important A town’s equalization rate is used to set a property’s Market Value based on the town’s current assessment of it and determine the fairness of the assessment.  (Remember: under the NJ tax system, the assessed value of a property is supposed to closely approximate the Market Value. However, Market Value can change over time whereas the assessed value typically remains constant until the next revaluation. The equalization rate is the mechanism used to translate the town’s current assessed value of the property into Market Value a/k/a as the Equalized Value.) The equalization rate, a/k/a the town-wide ratio to true value (Market Value), is a ratio established for the community by the County Board of Taxation through the sampling of usable (arms length transactions) current sales of properties across all property classes as they compare to the values established under the last revaluation.

Example: Assume that the last revaluation set a property’s assessed value at $1M and the town has an equalization rate of .50. In such a case, the Indicated Current Market Value (ICMV) of that property would be $2M. In other words, the town is really placing a value of $2M on the property for purposes of tax burden.  Now, if the current appraised value of the property is lower than the ICMV – e.g., $1.5M – then a successful appeal may be possible.  An appraised value at $1.5M w/ a .50 equalization rate means that the property should be assessed at $750K, not $1M.  Obviously, an assessed value of $750K should ultimately result in lower taxes against the property.

  • What is an I/E report and why is it important?  An I and E report is a request for income and expense information, sent out by the town assessor, to all Class #4 (income producing industrial, commercial or multi-residential) properties. The community has the right to request this information under the Chapter 91 laws and failure to comply can result in the loss of the right to appeal. [CBH note: failure to return an I/E report to the taxing municipality in a full and timely manner can subject an appeal to a motion to dismiss from the municipality.]
  • How and when do you think the South Jersey commercial market will rebound?  Which segment do you think will rebound first?  My crystal ball is no better than most of the professional prognosticators. Having said that, one thing is for sure: commercial always lags behind residential.  I don’t foresee any uptick in commercial until excess residential inventory is absorbed.  We also need to regain a normal balance between “new construction” inventory and “re-sale” properties.  Absorption of residential inventory and a re-balancing between new construction and re-sale are sure signs of job creation and improved purchasing power.  Job creation and improved purchasing power generally translates to increased office and retail demand.  I hate to say it, but I don’t see improvement in commercial for another 2-3 years.
  • Final thoughts?  Yes, the tax system in New Jersey is very difficult for the average taxpayer to understand.  Many property owners enter into the appeal arena with the intention of lowering their total annual amount of tax and are surprised to find out that the only element that can be placed under appeal is the current market value as of the effective appeal date.  An expert should be employed that understands the subtleties and vagaries of the tax laws and tax system and their impact on the valuation process.  My recommendation is first to enter into a consulting arrangement in order to pre-test the probabilities of a successful appeal.

Thanks, Harry!
 

Equalized Value: Learn It Before Filing a Tax Appeal

If you own CRE in NJ, how do you feel about your latest assessment?  Given how bad the 2009 market was, many of you are probably looking at the assessment and thinking about filing a property tax appeal.  (The appeal deadline is 4/1/10, unless there is a revaluation taking place.)  That's good.  Just know that in many cases the amount of the assessment is not an accurate indicator of the "true value" of your property and, therefore, not the number that should be considered.  Instead, you need to know the Equalized Value for your property when deciding whether a tax appeal is warranted.

Many owners do not realize that the assessment amount on the Notice of Assessment (green card) may not necessarily reflect the true value at which a property is being assessed and taxed by the municipality. This can turn out to be an expensive misunderstanding.

Keep in mind that in NJ property taxes are supposed to be based on the fair market value (FMV) of the property and that the annual assessments are supposed to reflect the FMV of the property.  However, as time passes between revaluations, that is often not the case.  Between revaluations, assessments generally remain unchanged from year-to-year whereas market values are constantly changing.  To address market fluctuations, each year the Division of Taxation analyzes current sales of properties across all property classes in a municipality as compared to the values established under the last revaluation. This results in what is known as a municipality’s annual Equalization Ratio (a/k/a Average Ratio) The Equalization Ratio for a particular municipality can be obtained from the assessor or County Board of Taxation. You can also find 2010 Equalization Ratios here.

The Equalization Ratio is used to translate the current assessed value of a property to its true assessed value a/k/a “Equalized Value.”  The Equalized Value is supposed to reflect the FMV of the property based on the current assessment and county data.  It is calculated by dividing the total assessment from the Notice of Assessment by the municipality’s Equalization Ratio.

For example, the 2010 Equalization Ratio for Linwood, NJ, is 61.99% whereas in Margate, NJ it is 84.28%. Thus, a $1M assessment in Linwood reflects an Equalized Value of $1,613,163.40 ($1M/61.99%). Meanwhile, a $1M assessment in Margate reflects an Equalized Value of $1,186,521.10 ($1M/84.28%).

Why is Equalized Value important?  Because the Equalized Value tells an owner the true value at which the municipality has assessed the property and, in turn, is collecting taxes under the tax rate.  Only by comparing the Equalized Value to the appraised FMV of a property can one begin to determine whether a tax appeal is warranted.

So, if you are still trying to decide whether to file a tax appeal, don't just look at the assessment, look at the Equalized Value of the property.  (You should also talk to an appraiser and attorney experienced w/ tax appeals, because the "fun" does not stop w/ "Equalized Value" when pursuing a tax appeal.)
 

Property Tax Appeal Q&A: Harry Renwick, Part I

To file a property tax appeal, or not to file, that is the question. (Apologies to William Shakespeare.)  April 1st is the deadline for most property tax appeals in New Jersey. (May 1st if the municipality is undergoing a revaluation in 2010.)  With April 1st fast approaching, it seemed like a good time to check in w/ Harry Renwick of Renwick and Associates.

As you will see, Harry has spent close to 50 years as a professional real estate appraiser and has extensive experience w/ real property tax appeals in New Jersey. (Full disclosure: my office does use Renwick and Associates as an expert in property tax appeals and we are proud to do so.)  I felt that his perspective on tax appeals would be helpful to any property owner or manager who has decided to file a tax appeal or is considering it.  Harry graciously agreed to participate in a Q&A session w/ me.  Because of the amount of information, the session has been broken down into 2 posts. This is Part I.  (The highlighting in the answers was done by me.)  I hope that you find the following information useful:

  • Tell us about your background/experience and what Renwick and Associates does 46 years as a professional real estate appraiser.  I hold a Senior Certified General Real Estate Appraiser (SCGREA) license designation in N.J.  I also hold a Certified Tax Assessor (CTA) designation in N.J. and I am a licensed real estate Broker.  Our company specializes in litigation matters involving all types of real estate. We provide real estate consulting and appraisal services which place defensible valuations on property for the purpose of settling disputes in matters involving real estate.  The disputes typically involve: real estate tax, federal income tax, eminent domain (condemnation), consumer fraud, insurance claims, economic (market) rent, equitable distribution of estates, bankruptcies, isolation of development rights etc. More information can be found at www.renwickandassociates.com.
  • In general, what is an appraisal?  An appraisal provides a defensible estimate of a property’s value as of a specific date in time. The appraisal is based on a set of disciplines required under state law. The appraiser is attempting to analyze comparable lease, cost and sales data that would be considered by participants (buyers/tenants) in a defined market. The results of this analysis are then correlated in to a final estimate of value.
  • What role does an appraiser play in a property tax appeal in NJ?  An appraiser performs an appraisal of the property and typically serves as an expert witness in support of the tax appeal if/when one is filed.  (At Renwick and Associates, we provide a preliminary evaluation at no charge to give the client an idea as to whether an appraisal and appeal would be worthwhile.) When appealing an assessment, the taxing municipality will have the benefit of an “expert” in support of its position. The property owner is best served to have its own expert to combat the assessor’s position.
  • Can you provide us w/ your current take on the SJ commercial market?  Anything of note in any of the following segments: multi-family; retail; or office?  The current multi-family market is generally experiencing higher than normal vacancy and credit rates directly related to the limited number of qualified tenants and the disruptions in the market related to the recession and the need to attract new qualified tenants. Operating Expense ratios are also trending upward which has a dampening effect on Annual Net Operating Income. Retail and office properties are generally following the same trend except vacancy and credit losses are considerably higher due to an over supply of space and limited number of new qualified tenants. Capitalization Rates are trending higher within each market as a direct response to the higher risk presented within the recessionary market. This also has a diminishing affect on the internal rate of return from these investments.  In short, things are tough in the South Jersey commercial market, especially in the retail and office segments.
  • Why can a property tax appeal be important in today’s economic climate?   The tax laws in New Jersey and many other states employ a standard of Market Value as the basis for the equitable distribution of budget levies over the municipal or city tax base. Under the tax system, a property’s assessed value is supposed to closely approximate its Market Value as of October 1st of the pre-tax year. In today’s economy, w/ sharply declining real estate markets, the assessed value of a property may no longer accurately represent the property’s Market Value.  If the current assessed value is proven to be inequitably high, based on a current appraisal, then substantial financial relief may inure to the property owner. 

In short: if it turns out that the current assessed value of a property is too high, a property tax appeal is the way to get it lowered and save the owner money.  If the owner is not passing through the tax burden to a tenant in full, then a high tax level would reduce Net Operating Income which, in turn, reduces the value of the property. In addition, having tax levels on a property which are competitively high can drive away potential buyers or tenants.

Check back in a couple of days for Part II of the Q&A w/ Harry Renwick regarding property tax appeals in New Jersey.

Round-Up: Multifamily Insiders

If you own or manage apartments in South Jersey, I encourage you to check out Multifamily Insiders, which is a site dedicated to the Apartment Industry.  There are a variety of resources on the site, including job and vendor listings as well as blogs and discussion threads.  I seem to always find some useful/interesting information + there is a real sense of "community" building on the site.  (Full disclosure: I have signed up to be a member of Multifamily Insiders but have no ownership interest or other financial interest in it and absolutely no involvement in running it.  I just find it to be a useful site.)

Anyway, I wanted to pass along some recent blog posts from Multifamily Insiders which I thought you might find useful/interesting:

  • Pablo Paz, National Safety and Maintenance Instructor for NAA Education Institute, warns that apartment properties will be subject to the EPA's new Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule which takes effect April 22, 2010.  For those unaware, among other things, the new Rule requires employees and contractors who perform any renovations, repairs, and painting in homes built before 1978 to be certified by an EPA-accredited training provider as to regulations and guidelines on how to work safely with lead-based painted surfaces.  The training has to be completed by the April 22/2010 deadline.  The post includes useful links to further information from the NAAEI and the EPA about the Rule and compliance.
  • Brent Williams has an excellent series of posts about the ugly, the bad, and the good (somewhat) that he was subjected to during the lease renewal process at his apartment complex.  The posts contain excellent analysis and food for thought for all managers or owners.  MORAL OF THE STORY: customer service and attention to detail add value to a property and are worth the effort.
  • On the topic of customer service, Eric Brown of the Urbane Lab has an excellent post on what he calls "Partnership Marketing" which, in this case, involves working w/ several businesses -- including local restaurants -- to provide custom shuttle service to residents at no cost to the property!  (You may recall Eric Brown/Urbane Apartments from an earlier post on marketing via social media.)  The free bus service clearly adds value to the property and it sounds like a real "win-win" for all involved.  What kind of "Partnership Marketing" opportunities might be available to your properties that would help add value?

A New Way for a Garden to Add Value

Can a garden increase a commercial property's value?  Sure, a garden adds aesthetic value, but how about to a property's bottom line?  And, how about if the garden is on the side of the building? 

Welcome to a concept known as a "Vertical Garden," a/k/a a Vegetal Wall, which was conceived by French scientist Patrick Blanc.  (A couple of pictures of existing Vertical Gardens are included w/ this post.)  I ran across the concept in the "First Look" section of the Winter/2009 edition of Development Magazine.

According to the article, Vertical Gardens contribute to reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and can also use recycled water, either from grey water from the building or recycled through the collection bay at the bottom.  Proponents have also found that a building's insulating properties are increased dramatically.

 HOW IT WORKS: A Vertical Garden is composed of 3 parts: a metal frame, a PVC layer and felt.  The frame is hung on a wall or can be self-standing.  It provides an air layer acting as a very efficient thermic and phonic isolation system.  A thin PVC sheet is then riveted on the metal frame.  This layer brings rigidity to the whole structure and makes it waterproof.  After that comes a felt layer that is stapled on the PVC.  The felt is corrosion-resistant and allows for uniform water distribution.  Watering is provided automatically, 4-5 times a day, through a drilled hose running along the top of the Vertical Garden.  Since there is no soil involved, the water must be supplemented w/ low concentrated nutrients through an automatic device.

According to the article, more than 200 Vertical Gardens have been installed around the world.  A check of Patrick Blanc's website shows only 7-8 in the U.S. so far, including installations in Tacoma, WA, and Charlotte NC.

I have no green thumb, but I like the idea b/c it could reduce HVAC costs and it could differentiate the property from competitors

The success of a Vertical Garden depends on using the right choice of plants according to the local environment.  Anybody know what kind of plants might work best in South Jersey?  :)

While a Vertical Garden can be of any dimension, it would seem that the highest return would be found w/ a larger building.  Obviously, not every type of building would be a good fit, as I doubt that a "big box" would want a garden growing on the side of the building, but I would think that a mid-rise office or multi-family building would work, as would certain retail and public buildings.

Who wants to be the first to grow a Vertical Garden in South Jersey? 

 

 

Local Press Round-Up

 Here are a couple of articles from newspapers serving the South Jersey area that caught my eye over the weekend:

The first is by Diane Mastrull of The Philadelphia Inquirer about an upscale multi-family property in New York using a wastewater-recycling system designed, installed and managed by American Water, which is based in Voorhees, NJ.  The name of the property is the Visionaire, located in Battery Park, which opened in September/2008 with LEED Platinum certification, the highest of the U.S. Green Building Council's sustainability standards.

The information about American Water's efforts to become more efficient and green is interesting, but what caught my eye was the fact that the owner's decision to use the system at a cost of nearly $2 million was an incentive from NYC: a 25% reduction in water rates.  According to Russell Albanese of the Albanese Organization, developer of the Visionaire:

The city's rates have been increasing on average 11 percent a year, so the savings over time should become more significant.

The second article was from Erik Ortiz of The Press of Atlantic City about the generally still-bleak outlook for local malls and retail in Atlantic County, NJ.  What caught my eye was the efforts by the new owners of Heather Croft Square to increase occupancy which apparently will include new frontage.

The moral of the stories for me: sometimes you have to spend money to make money.